

If you are getting ready for nursing school, the TEAS 7 Reading section is one of the first hurdles you will need to clear. It is not there to trip you up. Nursing means reading carefully under pressure all day long, from patient charts to medication orders to research, and this part of the exam checks whether you can do exactly that. The good news is that the Reading section is very predictable once you know how it is built, and that is most of the battle.
This guide walks through everything you need going in: how many questions there are, the three content areas being tested, the newer question formats on TEAS 7, what counts as a good score, and the study habits that actually move the needle. There are a few practice questions near the end so you can see how this all looks in real life.
The TEAS 7 Reading section gives you 55 minutes to answer 45 questions. Of those 45, only 39 count toward your score. The other 6 are unscored “pretest” questions that ATI is trying out for future exams. You will not be able to tell which questions are scored and which are not, so the only safe approach is to treat every single one as if it matters.
Here is the quick version before we get into the details:
| Detail | TEAS 7 Reading |
|---|---|
| Time limit | 55 minutes |
| Total questions | 45 |
| Scored questions | 39 |
| Unscored (pretest) questions | 6 |
| Content areas | 3 |
Do the math and you have a little over a minute per question. That sounds tight, and it is, but most questions do not need the full minute. The trick is spending your time where it counts, which we will get to.
Every question on the Reading section falls into one of three content areas. Knowing the split tells you where to focus your studying, because the questions are not divided evenly.
This is the largest single bucket, and it covers the core of reading comprehension. You will be asked to summarize a passage, pull out the main idea, locate a specific detail, follow a set of written directions, read information from a chart or graph, or put a series of events in the right order.
These questions reward students who can step back and see the big picture of a passage instead of getting lost in one sentence. A good habit while you study is to read a news article or a textbook section and then write a one-line summary of it. If you can do that quickly and accurately, you are in good shape here.
This is the smallest area, but it tends to be where students slow down. Instead of asking what a passage says, these questions ask how and why it was written.
You will need to tell the difference between fact and opinion, figure out the meaning of an unfamiliar word from the words around it, identify the author’s purpose (are they trying to inform you, persuade you, or entertain you?), and recognize the author’s point of view. None of this requires outside knowledge. Everything you need is sitting right there in the passage, which is exactly why slowing down and rereading a tricky sentence is worth the few extra seconds.
Tied for the largest area, this is the section that makes you think the hardest. Here you are not just understanding a passage. You are working with it.
Expect questions that ask you to draw a logical conclusion from the evidence, compare and contrast themes across two passages, judge whether an argument actually holds up, and pull information together from different sources like a graph plus a paragraph. This is the part of TEAS 7 that leans on real critical thinking, and it is also where ATI put more of its emphasis when it built this version of the exam.
If the only TEAS practice you have seen is older multiple-choice material, the format can catch you off guard. TEAS 7 mixes in a few question types that go beyond the standard “pick A, B, C, or D”:
You will not see a flood of these, but you will likely see a handful, so it pays to practice with material that includes them. Walking in expecting only multiple choice is an easy way to lose a few seconds of composure you cannot spare.

This is the question almost everyone asks, and the honest answer is: it depends on your school.
ATI does not set a single national pass-or-fail line. Instead, your score report shows a percentage for each section and an overall score, and each nursing program decides what it will accept. So the real number you need to know is the one your program publishes, not a general benchmark.
That said, it helps to know how ATI labels scores so you can read your report:
| Score level | What it generally means |
|---|---|
| Exemplary | Top performance, very few test-takers reach it |
| Advanced | Strong, competitive score |
| Proficient | Solid, meets the bar at many programs |
| Basic | Below what most programs want |
| Below Basic | Not yet ready |
Many programs look for an overall score somewhere in the 60% to 70% range, and competitive programs often want higher. A Reading score around 75% is a common target students aim for, but again, check your school first. One more thing worth knowing: TEAS scores are generally valid for about two years, and most programs let you retake the exam, though waiting periods and attempt limits vary. Confirm the policy with each school you are applying to before you book a retake.
If someone handed you their old TEAS 6 materials, a few things have changed. The Reading section is shorter now, dropping from 53 questions to 45, and the time limit came down too, from 64 minutes to 55. ATI also shifted the weight of the section toward Integration of Knowledge and Ideas, so you will spend more energy reasoning through passages and less time simply locating a fact someone already stated for you.
The takeaway is not to panic about fewer questions. Each one carries a little more weight, and the section as a whole asks you to think rather than just find.

Knowing the content is half of it. The other half is how you handle 45 questions in under an hour without burning out. These are the habits that tend to separate a good Reading score from a frustrating one.
This one small change saves more time than anything else. When you know what you are looking for, you read with a purpose and you are far less likely to get pulled in by extra information that was put there to distract you.
Some questions, especially the detail and vocabulary-in-context ones, only need a sentence or two. Others, like main idea or author’s purpose, do require the full thing. Learning to tell these apart quickly is a real time-saver.
Standardized tests love to bury the answer in a passage that includes details you do not need. If a fact feels like it is there to confuse you, it probably is. Stay anchored to what the question is actually asking.
A little over a minute per question is plenty for most of them. If one question is eating your time, mark it, move on, and come back. A single hard question is not worth three easy ones.
The passages on TEAS 7 are not all interesting. Some are dry instructions or technical write-ups. The more comfortable you are reading material that does not grab you, the steadier you will be on exam day.
Reading about the test only gets you so far. Here are three questions, one for each content area, with the reasoning spelled out. Try to answer before you read the explanation.
The “eight glasses of water a day” rule is one of the most repeated pieces of health advice, yet it has surprisingly little science behind it. The number appears to trace back to a 1945 recommendation that also noted most of that water already comes from food. That second part quietly dropped out as the advice was passed around. Most experts today agree that healthy adults can simply rely on thirst to know when to drink.
Which statement best summarizes the main idea of the passage?
A. People should stop drinking eight glasses of water a day. B. A common hydration rule is widely repeated but not well supported by evidence. C. The 1945 recommendation was the first study ever done on hydration. D. Most of the water people need comes from the food they eat.
Answer: B. The passage’s central point is that a familiar rule gets repeated without strong evidence. A overstates the point, since the passage never tells you to stop. C is not stated at all. D is a supporting detail, not the main idea, which is the trap for anyone who grabs the first true-sounding option.
If you have ever stood in a grocery aisle comparing two nearly identical products, you already understand the quiet genius of packaging design. The colors, the fonts, even the weight of the box in your hand are chosen to nudge you toward a decision before you have read a single word. None of it is an accident.
What is the author’s primary purpose in this passage?
A. To persuade readers to stop buying packaged products. B. To explain how packaging is designed to influence buyers. C. To compare two specific brands sold in grocery stores. D. To warn readers about dishonest companies.
Answer: B. The tone is explanatory, not persuasive or alarmed. The author is walking you through how something works. A and D read a warning into the passage that is not there, and C is far too specific for a passage that never names a product.
A city council member argued that the new bike lanes had made downtown safer, pointing to a 20% drop in car accidents in the year after the lanes opened. That same year, the city also lowered the downtown speed limit and installed several new traffic cameras.
Which of the following is the strongest reason to question the council member’s conclusion?
A. Bike lanes have become popular in many other cities. B. The 20% figure may have been rounded up. C. Other changes made that same year could also explain the drop in accidents. D. The council member personally supports the bike lanes.
Answer: C. The argument credits the bike lanes, but two other changes happened at the same time, and any of them could be responsible for the drop. Spotting that competing explanation is the heart of evaluating an argument. A is irrelevant, B is too minor to matter, and D points to bias rather than to a flaw in the logic itself.

Once you understand the format, your studying gets a lot more efficient. A few things that consistently help:
To put all of this into practice, the free Archer Review TEAS 7 Question Bank gives you over 1,500 questions written to mirror the real exam, each with a full rationale so you understand the why behind every answer. If you learn better by watching, the On-Demand video lessons cover every goal and objective on the test, and the near-weekly live webinars are led by licensed instructors who walk through the trickier topics in real time. For one-on-one help, private TEAS tutoring is available for any subject or objective on the exam.
You can also keep building out the rest of your prep with our companion guides to the TEAS 7 Science, TEAS 7 Math, and TEAS 7 English and Language Usage sections.
There are 45 questions. Only 39 are scored; the remaining 6 are unscored pretest questions, and you will not know which ones they are.
You get 55 minutes, which works out to a little over a minute per question.
There is no single national cutoff. Each nursing program sets its own requirement, so check the score your school expects. Many programs look for an overall score in the 60% to 70% range, and competitive programs often want more.
Alongside standard multiple choice, you may see multiple-select (select-all-that-apply), fill-in-the-blank, hot spot, and ordered-response questions.
It is very manageable once you know the format. The hardest part for most students is the time pressure and the longer Integration of Knowledge and Ideas passages, both of which get easier with timed practice.
The TEAS 7 Reading section is one of the most beatable parts of the exam, because it is so consistent. Learn the three content areas, get comfortable with the newer question formats, practice reading under a clock, and review your answers honestly. Do that, and you will walk in knowing exactly what is coming.
Ready to start? Jump into the free Archer Review TEAS 7 Question Bank and put these strategies to work today. Best of luck on your TEAS 7 journey.
ATI® and TEAS® are registered trademarks of Assessment Technologies Institute®, which is not affiliated with and does not sponsor or endorse Archer Review.